Who gets to compete in the Paralympics?

    The Paralympics is an event that is one of the most powerful platforms for athletes with disabilities to showcase their talents. But this raises important questions– should every disabled athlete be allowed to compete in any Paralympic sport? And how do we make sure that there is fairness when disabilities can vary so widely? 

    When first thinking about it, the idea of allowing any athlete with a disability to compete seems fair. But in actuality, inclusion of any level of disability could mess with the very purpose of the Paralympics: meaningful and inclusive competition between athletes with similar levels of ability.

For example, a runner with mild cerebral palsy (which has minimal impact on movement) would have a clear advantage over an athlete with severe spasticity (which causes tight, restricted muscles). And another example, in swimming, someone with a partial amputation may not face the same challenges as a swimmer with all four limbs missing. If all of these athletes were placed in the same race, the results wouldn’t properly reflect the athleticism. It would only reflect who is not as affected by their disability. This is  why we need strict eligibility criteria in the Paralympics.


    The Paralympic system of classification isn’t meant to exclude, but rather it’s meant to fairly group athletes into the appropriate classification. To do this, there is a three-step process:

  1. Eligible Impairment Check – This step asks the question of does the disability fit one of the 10 recognized types?

  2. Minimum Impairment Criteria (MIC) – This step asks: Is their disability severe enough to impact athletic performance?

  3. Sport Class Allocation – This final step asks: Which competitive category makes sure that this is a level playing field for the athlete?

This system ensures that, for example, a swimmer with only moderate limb weakness competes against athletes with similar swimming ability.

Without processes like these, the Paralympics would not be able to say, with credibility, who is the better athlete in a sport. 

 

    Some could argue that the current system of the Paralympics excludes athletes whose disabilities don’t neatly fit inside the existing categories. Which is a valid concern, but I disagree that classification should be discontinued. Rather, the focus of improving this should be on things like expanding research, creating new classifications, and further supporting disabled sports outside the Paralympics. 




    In all, I believe that classification is an important aspect of the Paralympics that ensures competitive integrity and overall fairness, but that does not mean there's not room for improvement. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Inspiration Porn: Nobody's Getting Off

Image
     My personal experiences with disabilities are limited. Nobody in my immediate circle deals with any obvious physical disabilities, or any noticeable mental disabilities. The only experiences I have had have been through observation of people in spaces that we share, such as school. A more recent observation of mine was watching a girl who was in a wheelchair navigate the narrow opening of the bus stop in front of campus center, and watching the process of the shuttles wheelchair lift in use. A few things I thought about while watching this was how cold the metal on her chair must be (it was 14 degrees outside), and how early she must have to get her day started to account for the extra ten minutes it would take to get her on and off the bus, let alone travel time in the bus, and to class. I thought about how annoying it would be to have a class in a building just across the stairs near the shuttle stop, but having to work your way around the iced and salted campus, s...
Read more

Prosthetics in Sports: Fair or Unfair?

Image
       Adaptive technology in sports is a fascinating topic, but it is also a topic that raises many questions about fairness, accessibility, and how we define fair competition. On one hand, it’s incredible from a scientific and medical standpoint to see how technology like running blades or specialized equipment can level the playing field for athletes with disabilities, allowing them to compete at the highest levels. It’s inspiring to watch athletes push the boundaries of what’s possible and challenge traditional ideas of physical limitations. And it also serves to show other disabled athletes just what they can be capable of with the right aids. On the other hand, I can’t help but wonder about the broader implications, especially for athletes from disadvantaged nations who might not have access to the same resources. Because of this, the conversation moves from abled vs disabled, to privileged vs the unprivileged.       The cost of adaptive tec...
Read more

Media Coverage On the Paralympics

Image
       There are a few things that I think could be done to increase Paralympic media coverage and all other disabled sports combined. First, I think that for more media coverage to be made, there must be more investment into media that covers disabled sports. Not only this, but encouragement should also be made toward larger networks and platforms to stream the Paralympics or Paralympic advertising. Ads are also a great way to bring the Paralympic games to people's attention, although you must be aware how these commercials frame the athletes. While watching the Paralympic commercials for this week's material, I found that they all stood out to me as showcasing the importance of the ability and the humanness of the athletes rather than focusing on the disability of the athlete.       I find that this type of media coverage for disabled people could further serve to address the issues of how people with disabilities are often portrayed in lights t...
Read more